>>54061

Ganbare, Cirno-chan!

Good morning.

Though I wonder if you can call it good considering the news.

What sort of lewd, disgusting things are you /seacats/ discussing?! You should be disappointed in yourselves!

>SAO

People play that?

>>54064
You're right, I agree. We should just pretend it doesn't exist.

>>54060
The sex scene in SAO, is just the author being a lewd pervert and wanting to write a sex scene, and coming up with a pathetic and stupid reason for it. Sex scenes don't make stories great, stories can still be great without them.

He threw in an irrelevant sex scene, that 'sounds' like it adds nothing to the story. (I say sounds, because I have to actually read much of SOA. Obviously my opinion made be false since it is only based on the small amount I've read/watched of SOA, and the knowledge of the sex scene.)

>>54067
Any good story has to have a sex scene. Sex happens all the time in real life. We don't want to be unrealistic.

>>54067
Funny, I'd never even heard of that until now~

I actually think I saw /a/ talking about it. I just didn't realize there were people who actually read it~

>>54068
Wrong there are lots of stories people consider good, that don't have a sex scene in them. Even if the possibility is hinted at, actually writing out the scene in detail is different.

I won't deny that there are good stories with sex scenes in them. But a book does not have to have a sex scene to be good. Likewise, having a sex scene in the book does not make it good.

Stop hyping, it's just a sentence glop glop glop.

>not reading all eight of the translated SAO volumes

>>54070
Well sure, other people might consider them good. I guess it's good in some fantasy settings where stuff like that might not exist. But in a realistic story you have to include it or you don't meet that realism.

Complaining about a sex scenes because you think it's unnecessary is like complaining about a scene where a character eats, or drinks, or uses a toilet. Sex is a basic human need, so I don't think it should be treated differently in stories about humans.

>>54074

The SAO ero scene was actually pretty funny too.

>>54072
Says the person who hasn't finished Umineko~

>>54073
Wow. That's a pretty stupid thing to say there Piece. You don't put things in a story simply to feel out the "realism" criteria, I mean, ignoring the obvious example of hundreds of story not made to be realistic, you mean that for a story to be considered plausible you need a sex scene ? Do you think we should had people walking in the street in each story ? The death of pets ? The loss of your first teeth ? Those are everyday things, why wouldn't they be added ?

You don't add sex scenes simply because it happens in everyday life, heck you don't even add anything simply because it happens in life. A scene has to have a point, it may be ridiculous, scandalous, stupid, irrelevant, but you don't write something "simply because it happens all the time", it just becomes pointless and meaningless.

I'm still not sure you're actually serious about this.

>>54078
Woah, I don't know if I want to get into a debate with such forceful language. Can we just agree to disagree for now?

Actually I don't know about this Sword Art Online stuff, I'm not sure what it's all about, I'm just stating my opinion on sex scenes in general. I'm sure it's a very worthy work if George has peeled himself with difficulty away from Umineko readings temporarily just to read it.

>>54079
Was I forceful ? Er. I guess I was. I didn't mean to particularly insult you, even if I do still think that's pretty stupid, but...
I guess if you don't want to get in a debate that's fine, I was just sharing my thoughts.
And about SAO ? I don't care about it , I've never watched nor the show nor red the LN,what I know about it all comes from those thread in /a/. All things considered, it doesn't seem to be that great of a story, at least not my kind of story, but I can see how peoples can like it.

>>54079
You are mean.

>>54081
Huh? Why?

>>54081
Nope , that's Piece.

>>54077
>>54079

I read SAO about as often as I read Fate.

>>54082
You know why.

>>54085
I'm afraid I don't.

There are lots of reasons people could call me mean. I'm aware of some of those. I can't finger a reason for why anyone in particular finds me mean, though.

Really, I'm not mean at all.

>>54086
I don't find you mean at all. I don't really find any /seacat/ "mean".

>>54086
Liar.

>>54088
Which of those are you calling a lie?

Some people must find me mean if you do, and I'm not psychic. So you must be saying I'm lying about being mean.

Meanness is a matter of perspective. If I don't consider myself mean, then that's a valid opinion on the matter, isn't it?

>>54089
It wasn't directed at any of those, but you in general.

>>54090
Wait , who are you again!?

>>54090
Well, it might be harder to deny that I am, generally, a liar.

However, isn't everyone?

>>54091
Nobody.

>>54092
Maybe.

>>54093
I know the only person who should call themselves nobody.

>>54094
That's fine.

http://boards.4chan.org/cgl/res/6087259#p6088089

>>54096
There was a thread on /jp/ about how some guy misclicked on /cgl/ and he didn't realize for 5 minutes.

I confirmed that this was quite impossible, but not before posting in the weeaboo thread.

>>54097
qad
but /cgl/ has dramu and dresses and cosplayshit everywhere
did you post that

>>54098
I did not post it.

>>54099

>>54100
I've got episode 4 left to read.

>>54101
ok god luk

>>54101
It's been very boring since you left.

>>54103
I know, right? I'm the life of this board. They should pay me.

*･゜ﾟ･*:.｡..｡.:*･'(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)'･*:.｡. .｡.:*･゜ﾟ･

>>54105
hi how was your day *･゜ﾟ･*:.｡..｡.:*･'(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)'･*:.｡. .｡.:*･゜ﾟ･

>>54106
omg i wuz out but now hom!!!!! *･゜ﾟ･*:.｡..｡.:*･'(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)'･*:.｡. .｡.:*･゜ﾟ･*

>>54107
omg yay im home too!!!

>>54108
yay hom is gud!!!!

>>54109
omg dun do that it frekas me out man!!!!!!!!!!!

>>54110
>>54110
omh sorry man dood gor freaking u out guy man

>>54111
omg no its sunday now!!!! ((((；ﾟДﾟ)))))))