>>7155
Poison was involved?

>>7156
poison isnt involved in the murder since there are clearly hole in all thier body
[[Insects aren't involved btw]] hehe.

>>7157
Karthus pressed R.

>>7158
no malzahar pressed R
blllaaaaaaggghhhhh

>>7567
Naturally, that daughter of a whore Erika killed George, then with her lewd lubricated swimsuit squeezed through the door opening! The door was locked using Garashi's key, and George was murdered before the story.

>>7568
... What ?

After George's death, the key in Garashi's possession was never used to lock the door!

>>7569
Did I ever say Garashi's key was the key she possessed? As an additional trick I had prepared, Garashi and George's keys were swapped, so George had Garashi's master key and Garashi had George's cabin key.

>>7570 Oh ! Excellent !

I wouldn't have found it quickly I think. You may have given up a little easily there ~

>>7477
You said just now,

"After killing Genji they locked the door and left through the window."

However, the narration text during the discovery of the crime said this:

"Battler carefully puts his hand on the doorknob and gives it a twist, but does not open it. It seems that it isn't locked."

And quite so, we are able to enter without using a key to unlock the door.

But you just said that they locked the door, then left through the window! So who unlocked it?!

L O G I C E R R O R ! ! !

>>7478
>implying setting a chain doesn't effectively lock a door

"It's called a chain lock for a reason you know. Maybe you want me to be more specific, I may consider it if you kissed my shoes.

Then again, if you're that desperate for the win maybe you should put some effort towards actually solving the mysteries."

>>7479
Well, I thought you might say something like that. But I digress, I'm almost done so I won't press you on it.

sixth thread
>>7481

>>7251
(Investigation mode has not been activated)

>>7252
Can I activate it?

>>7253
Nope.

fifth thread:

>>7255

>>7070
Even if nobody could have obtained the guns from the study at that time, if Krauss or Kumasawa is the culprit, since they regularly visit Kinzo, they could have secretly taken one of the guns at some times prior to the murder. Alternatively, Genji is only an accomplice, and someone asked him to get the gun for them - in that case, the culprit could be anyone without an alibi. It's also possible that the culprit had a gun prepared from elsewhere, and did not need one of Kinzo's Winchesters.

But, am I missing something, or is the crime basically solved now? Wasn't our purpose simply to prove that the crime is possible for humans, which has been done? Or do we have to show who the culprit is as well?

Well, at this point, it's either Krauss, Genji, Eva, or Hideyoshi.

>>7094
I suppose you're right. We'll move on in a day or two then (give me some time to finalize the writings). You've proven capability by human hands, but you have yet to reach an agreeable truth.

While we're waiting for the next round, I'll add this to the Genji theory. There is one time when he could safely commit the crime in spite of being on duty: immediately after he served drinks to the arguing adults. At that time he could be relatively confident that no more calls would come in from them for a while, and since Gohda and Kumasawa were busy with dinner preparations, there was little chance of them coming to the servant's room and finding him missing.

I'll go ahead and ask these too, but if they'll disrupt your preparations then I can just sit on them until the next round.

> How far is Krauss's study from Jessica's room?
> Does Natsuhi remember hearing anything that could have been a gunshot while she was there?
> Natsuhi asks Eva and Hideyoshi exactly where they went outside during the break, whether they saw anyone else, and whether they heard anything that could have been a gunshot.

Dead week this week and finals the week after.

I will continue working on this gameboard after that...