>>51857
Stop pining for us to "accept" and "forgive" you. That's a natural part of being a member of this community.

> If I say that I'm leaving, which is what you think I'm only doing for attention, then that perception acts as a buffer to keep me away. Because I don't want to come back after making that fuss. It makes me look silly, and apparently allows people to form views of me like the one you hold.
If you truly want to leave you don't need a "buffer"; That's just acting tsun.

>>51858
Of course, someone who's John-level is reliable, insightful, keen and capable.

>>51864
That's just overly simplifying things.

Can you be rich just by wanting to be? Can you study just because you want to pass? Or work hard just towards your dream because you truly want to achieve it? It's easy to say yes to all of these as long as you `truly' want them, but that's just being callous towards what you know it is to be human. Your short-term actions often conflict with your long-term goals. You do things on impulse that you regret, that you told yourself before you'd never do again, but you don't seem to care at that moment in time.

I always regret every day I post here.

>>51863
Contradictory feelings, what a sweet taste. Why did you talk to someone anyway? Recordings do exist, and that's total illusion breaking. In fact, I've kept more of the illusion than you have.

Even if I could do something I wouldn't. Not until the opportune moment. And Meta? He's an idiot. He's not halfway as interesting as he thinks, and only petty people are drawn to his fake charisma~

>>51867
That's just trying to sidetrack. You can become a part of the community by acting as one instead of hopelessly relying on approval to be one. Communities don't often dispute your claim if you act as one of them unless you're totally unlike them (you're not).

In any case, you're clearly not interested in what I have to say. Do as you please.

>>51868
>picking on Meta
Picking on the little kids again, Belphe-nii?

>>51868
What's 'fake charisma'? I don't think it works that way. He must have a charisma score, and it's not fake.

It's possible recordings don't exist, beyond my own personal stash of them. And those recordings are unnecessary, because I could create more if I wanted to.

I used to talk on ventrilo every day with my old WoW guild friends, until I visited less and less frequently and eventually stopped altogether. I only kept contact with Friend-kun via IM, not vent. One night on /a/, Lambda invited me into a vent with Meta and I obliged Two years later, after ib4f died, I believe, I went to two other vents on different occasions to talk to people who had heard me already - Cake, Meta and Friend-kun.

If any of those three have recordings, they must have gone out of their way to do it in an alternative way. Because I blocked people from recording me through vent.

>>51869
I believe I was making a legitimate point, it's just that it only pertained to the second statement you made in your post. I didn't respond to the first statement at all. Regardless, I don't see what's wrong with wanting to accepted, and don't have much to say beyond that.

>you're clearly not interested in what I have to say.
I could say the same to you if you're just going to hand-wave my post as "trying to sidetrack." Still, I think there's not much to be said by either of us. I've made my case and you've made yours. I just think you're mostly mistaken in your assumptions about me.

>>51870
Ah, it's such a shame when I let the bully in me slip. Thanks for always being around to correct me~

>>51871
I won't talk of it any more, I supposed it'd be rude of me.

So you took all precautions and if anything happened it was beyond you? I can't say it's a total mess up then, but still. Pretty risky for someone like you who is so concerned with privacy and reputation.

>>51873
That's what I'm here for, Belphe-jii.

>>51873
They were all heat-of-the-moment decisions. I don't like how speaking with someone over voice chat is an entirely different experience to talking with them via text.

There's no cute images to accompany everything, and the sound of their voices gets in the way of your assessment of them. That relates to illusion breaking, of course. And I don't like it.

I think I used to like it, though. It may have been /seacats/ or imageboards in general that poisoned me against the idea. I always had a distaste of how obnoxious people from /a/ sounded when there was some public ventrilo thread. I formed the idea that the communities of those imageboards, and their associated interests, should only ever be discussed in text form anonymously, and in the places appropriate.

>>51874
Still waiting on my super awesome grimdark magic story~

>>51876
It'll take a while, I'm not generally in a mood where everything is terrible and the world is crap.

>>51876
If you've forgotten my age, I don't see why I should remind you. It works to my advantage, that way. Not that it would be hard for you to find out.

I'd be more curious to know how old you think I am.

>>51877
That's alright! I don't mind waiting for however long it takes. I-I didn't mean your age though, I was responding to Piece. I wouldn't mind knowing yours too though, seeing as you're a senior member and all~

>>51878
I never used any talk devices online. But as for the age, I do forget. I think you're a year younger than me or something.

>>51879
I always view you as younger than me, but I think that's because I mixed up your age with Satan's.

>>51880
See we could end this all right now. Clear up all the confusion, the doubt.

All you have to do is give me your age and I'll clear up everything.

>>51881
Nope. I think I've already figured out your age.

And whether you're younger or older, I can't view you as an elder. You don't have that aura about you, unlike Lili here.

>>51882
Oh really? Even if it's true I won't confirm, but I'm personally curious if you could guess correctly. Even if you don't tell me yours I can always find out through other means.

I don't want to be viewed as an elder anyway. Elders are stuffy, pompous and old. They're not fun and entertaining~

>>51860
I only hate 99% of people. There are a few I can stand, some I find interesting, and others I genuinely like to talk with (these ones are super-rare).

>>51866
>reliable
It feels good being praised, but this one feels out of place among the rest...

>>51879
Let George's age be g and my age be l.

floor(g / 10) + ({x} * 10) = l

>>51883
It used to be that I was one of the younger /seacats/. But then we had all those 11 year olds join. I wonder if Meta is above the average age now?

>>51885
That's {x} * 100, not 10.

>>51884
Which category do I fall in~?

>>51885
>Maths
Dammit Lili, my old nemesis. Time to break out the calculator and wait for piece to post the answer first.

>>51888
I can make it easier, just tell me your age.

>>51888
I could post the value of both variables, but it's better to leave you guessing. And more importantly, if I give away the ages of others so freely, people would feel justified in doing the same with mine.

Also, I only recall ages by their difference to mine. So I could be a year off depending on the months.

>>51886
Those eleven year olds came out of nowhere, jesus.

>>51889
But that would mean giving Piece a victory! Can't you give me an easier math problem~? I don't know how to solve with two unknowns, I'm dumb.

>>51891
You're really dense. Consider that George may be or may not be 21.

floor( 21 / 10 ) = floor(2.1), and floor refers to the highest whole integer that is lower than the value behind it.

Here, it would be 2.

The fractal part {x} is 0.1, which multiplied by 100 becomes 10, add the value of the floor and you get 12.

>>51882
Piece must be 20.

>>51883
There's not an icecube's chance in hell that Belphe is over 21.

>>51888
「Tolerable」.

>>51893
I can neither confirm nor deny.

Come to think of it, weren't you the same age as Meta?

>>51892
Uhhhhh. So you're....twelve? Riri math is my bane; it's like Gil going up against Shirou. My magic code is weak against maths.

>>51893
Not an icecube's chance? And just why is that!?

As for something more easily solved.

If you add the ages of my eldest sibling and I, the result equals 50. If you double the difference in age between my eldest sibling and I, you have equal my age, and if you triple it you have my eldest sibling's age. My age can be divided by 4 numbers, excluding itself.

>>51896
Is it an icecube's chance in hell or in Antarctica?

>>51897
........I-I give up. I'm twenty one, John was right. I can't fight against maths in any form.

Now you said you'd tell me yours~

>>51899
Ara. You're younger than I thought, Belphe-chan.

>>51900
Please, I know you're even younger than me. I just don't know by how much.

Do I really seem like an old fart?

>>51899
Let your age be b and mine be t.

floor( b / 10 ) + ( {x} * 100 ) = v

( v / 2 )^2 / v = t

>>51901
Oh really? I never confirmed John's claim.

>>51902
Last one should be - v, not / v

>>51895
Might've been. I don't really remember, people have always thought me to be older than I am anyway.
Evasive responses like that are generally an indicator that the guess is correct, or damn close.

>>51896
Factoring in the various possibilities, what little of your personal background that I know, and a small margin of error, the chances of you being 22 or older are abysmally low. Like 4% or something.
It has nothing at all to do with your maturity, intelligence, density, posting style, or anything of this sort. Trust me. I mean it. Truthfully.

>>51897
Lili is 20? さすが美しい美少女。

>>51902
R-Riri! That's crueeeel! I don't know if I could even solve these if I was awake, well fed and alert!

>>51903
That you did not. But Friend said so in one of the many streams you missed. Might have been Cake; someone connected to you said so in any case.

>>51905
Well you were spot on. I probably shouldn't have revealed as much as I did in those chats all those years ago. Not like I really care much if people know my age; as soon as I revealed it I knew Bern would lock it forever.

All this conversation has been a bit hard to follow at times, but I think it's kind of interesting...~

>>51906
If you're 21 this should be child's play, since it is solved by children who are g * 0.75 years old.

>>51908
Try following it and attempting mental math while half-asleep, it's giving my brain a real workout over here.

>>51905
Lili's eldest sibling is younger than her.

>>51906
If you say so.

>>51908
So you think you're more optimistic than Riri, eh~?

>>51909
Well as long as you've given me a true way to solve it I can always work through it later. Seriously, English and writing are so much better than math.

>>51911
...Then 30? Huh, I always thought she was like 26 at the very oldest.

>>51911
Wait, that doesn't work either. Can't a high school drop out even do simultaneous equations? Or was Lili's information wrong? Or was the answer supposed to be a lie?

>>51912
Under normal circumstances, it's quite possible~ Right now I don't feel so good though.

>>51914
See?! I freaking told you that math sucks!

>>51915
Is something bothering you at the moment?

>>51914
You tried to trick me, that's what the problem is!

>If you add the ages of my eldest sibling and I, the result equals 50.
20 + 30 = 50
>If you double the difference in age between my eldest sibling and I, you have equal my age, and if you triple it you have my eldest sibling's age.
Difference in age = 30 - 20 = 10
Double that = 10 * 2 = 20
Triple it = 10 * 3 = 30
>My age can be divided by 4 numbers, excluding itself.
Excluding itself, 20 is divisible by 2, 4, 5 and 10.

My brain blew a fuse trying to work all that out at once.

>>51917
But Lili can't be 20. That's why I thought it must be the other way around, but it didn't make sense that way either.

... there was actually a solution?

>>51919

>>51916
Perhaps~

Funnily enough, we used to joke that Lili was the oldest /seacat/ and that she was almost 30 because she set the 20s as the upper limit for her age at one point. It turned out XXXX was actually older.

>>51920
And this is why there is never any downfall to being lazy, ne.

>>51921
You could talk about it if you like; might make you feel better!

>>51921
Did you have a fight with Lambda?

>>51868
Using thy name in vain is surely a sin, perhaps a rhetorical rhyme to add a positive new spin?

>>51925
...Meta?

>>51925
He's well informed, this classy lad; I hope this doesn't turn out bad?

>>51926
When sleep does not work, and rest is too much, perhaps I'll stay if you're willing to be my crutch.

>>51928
Is that really you?

>>51923
>>51924
Wouldn't call it that. I probably shouldn't go spreading it around anyway~

I almost posted a self-deprecating rant here, but I deleted it, so too bad for you~

>>51929
My hatred for the sea is starting to dwindle, perhaps if we keep talking our forlorn love will be rekindled?

'Tis surely a miracle if ever I've seen one, I can't rhyme for shit outside of an oil drum.

>>51931
Kyaaa!

>>51930
>I almost posted a self-deprecating rant here, but I deleted it

Damn. And here I thought I could creep into the cracks of your optimism a bit. Good game~

>>51933
New and improved, with style and class, I haven't lost my feature, of wooing these lass.

Ah, finally my connection is back ! I tried to sleep early because of that and was reminded of how much I acted like a faggot sometimes.
Sorry about that Misha, I hope you didn't trouble yourself to make time when I couldn't attend the game. Sorry if it was the case.

Seems like some crazy stuff is happening again.
Why is always when I sleep ?

>>51935
It things are finally looking up for this place.

Is it true you have a mole on the side of your face?

>>51934
So tell me this much, and sorry if this comes out of nowhere~

Just how important do you feel "physical proof" is for a relationship? Can a relationship be real, even if the only contact you have with another person be online? I'm curious~

>>51937
A mole most would call a beauty mark, when the young ladies gander, their hearts get a kickstart.

Does anyone have the Stein's Gate Original Soundtrack+Radio music files? (I'm looking at you John)

It's a bit too early to ask but all the dead download links are starting to annoy me.

>>51938
You're usually so sure of yourself and your opinions. How out of character.

Of course it doesn't matter. I feel like some of the most honest connections with people can only take place in writing, of which online contact primarily consists, because you can talk heart to heart. It doesn't matter what you sound like, what gender you are or what race you are.

Did Lambda want you to meet him or something?

>>51938
It's vital.

>>51938
That's such a complex question. It depends on how you view relationships, and what exactly you want to get out of it.

I mean, I see it both ways. In one sense your relationship isn't as complete as it could be if you never meet the person and simply remain online friends. On the other hand, just because you don't meet up doesn't mean that you can't have a meaningful relationship. In the end I'd probably say that, yeah, you could have a real relationship online if that's what both parties truly desire.

>>51941
Sometimes in life, you must show a little skin, but care not for strife, cause it could turn into a win-win.

>>51939
Mole is such a dirty word, but of course I didn't mean offense by it. So the sprite was accurate?

>>51940
Err... which ones in particular? If it has to be DDL then I can upload a few with my terrible upload speeds, or there's this torrent this has almost everything, but it's missing the 8bit and Symphonic Material soundtracks.

http://bakabt.me/163778-steins-gate-sound-collection.html

>>51945
Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder, perhaps you get to see for yourself--when you're just a little older.

>>51944
How lewd. I'm very conservative.

>>51947
Me? A little older? Well, maybe.

I like the sprite. I think it's much classier than the other ones.

>>51941
Well, I have my own strong opinions, but I'm willing to accept that other people think differently~ That's why I don't often engage in such debates, but I have my reasons this time~

I feel that the belief that "online relationships don't matter" is wrong as well. I feel more connected to people I've met online than I ever felt in real life. And even if part of their personality that I connect with isn't "real," in that it doesn't match up to their physical self, then so what? I mean, I'm a firm believer that the body, mind, and soul are not entirely separate things and are codependent on one another, but even so, I don't think it's wise to dismiss one's persona online just because it could be false. I mean, a lot of people are false in real life too. If I was really introverted and shy outside, why should that matter for the people I meet online~? In fact, I find saying "in real life" when meaning it as opposed to "online" is bunk in and of itself, because this "online" world is real as well~

>>51942
Only vital if the relationship is a sexual one, I think~ Which I don't have a problem with, really! I think it's great! But if sexual contact is unnecessary, then I don't see why it's important at all~

>>51943
I don't know what "complete" means in that sense. See, I think that for a healthy platonic relationship, it's entirely unimportant to have physical contact at all, and an online relationship can be quite real and fulfilling~ But that is only my opinion, again, and I know many disagree~

>>51949
Class and style, it was as said, if I keep this rhyming up I might soon get wed.

>>51950
Well, in the sense that if you could meet up, could see each other, and could have a more "intimate" relationship...yet you choose not to in favor of a solely online thing, then you aren't taking your relationship as far as you could. If that matters to one person, and not the other, it might cause some friction.

But in the end, yeah, I agree with you. Online relationships can be meaningful, and if both people don't care about the physical part, then so be it. Saying sexual contact is necessary to relationships feels weird to me; to each their own. Though I would imagine most people would prefer sex in their relationships, regardless.

>>51950
I agree! Without doubt, the closest connections I've ever had to people were all online. I don't think that an online persona is fake just because it differs from the impression you get of the person when you speak to them through audio, or when you meet them face to face. They are all aspects of the same person.

Oftentimes, I like the online text-only persona of people a lot more. And that, I believe, is because shallow impressions are getting in my way, or because the person can't express how they really think and feel very well over different modes of communication.

>>51946
>6.94 gb
>Flac

You supabaka, I don't need Flac for all of them! I guess I have to rely on a torrent then, thanks anyway.

>>51950
Relationships are troublesome when they're based around sex, but on the very bright side, at least you won't be "Next".

>>51952
I'm not talking about strictly romantic/sexual relationships here. More in terms of friendships and generally knowing another person well~

See, that's my gripe, obviously in a romantic relationship I would need to have physical contact. But as far as being friends goes, even very close friends, best friends, whatever you want to call it, I don't see that extra bit as being essential or even desirable, if the relationship didn't start on those terms anyway~

>>51951
Wed, you say? Aren't you already taken?

>>51950
Without sex there's no reason to be in a "relationship"; Assuming relationship is that of lovers, not just friends.

If you're just friends, I still think physical contact is vital. You need a face to put to those words, and you need a bond stronger than that of just words. You need memories and camaraderie.

>>51950
But people are lustful, I should know, I'm a teenager ~
I don't dismiss any kind of online friendship, because I do think those exist even if they are bound to different rules than those of the common world. But, honestly, even if I see how platonic love could happen online, I don't see it as a form of true love.
Well I wouldn't know anyway, I seem to not understand what love is, even doubting it's existence itself nowadays.

>>51959
Sex is icky and gross. I think it's beautiful for a romantic relationship to be able to transcend biological imperatives.

>>51958
Tis a joke for this morn, as ever dreadful as it be, but if I don't watch my words, my love might slam me into a tree.

>>51957
Well, yeah; if it didn't start on those terms there is no real reason why it needs to be included. Unless the relationship type "changes" from one of being extremely close friends into a romantic thing. Then you can probably start including the more physical aspects~

>>51959
This is an interesting interpretation. Though I don't think physical value is needed for friendship, and I also don't think sex is the sole defining factor of a romantic relationship. To each their own though, nyan~

>>51962
I see. Anything to make the rhyme, I suppose. Are you going to do this the whole time?

>>51955
It's a bit excessive, but the .mp3 torrent is missing a lot more. It's linked on that page if you check on the "Other versions" list, though.

Also, these 3 albums aren't on either of those torrents yet, I don't think.
http://www.mediafire.com/?rdjlx5sardjgyzy
http://www.mediafire.com/?a406uy6f6lwt3zd
http://www.mediafire.com/?bk1dit0gujt4pzz