Or maybe you already left?

It was fun.

>>52039
Arguments are happening here all the time, though. Just wait a few hours and another one is bound to come along.

>>52037
When someone uses the construct "I think you are", I usually take everything after that personal. Has to do with the "you" referring to me and all.

>I didn't figure you'd automatically assume that I really considered you to be a "misguided pessimist,"
>you should just assume that I was joking around there, okay?
I'm not sure if I should feel better that my attempts at a serious discussion were swept aside for "lol so funny xD", nor how I should feel about someone calling me something repeatedly and then assuming they don't actually mean it. I don't think it's very appropriate you were joking around when I was seriously answering your question.

In any case, I told you I was offended because I wanted you to know I don't like that kind of behaviour, so no bad blood exists between us (from my side) for this. Don't do it again.

>>52043
>it copies Astaroth's image
Anon-tan there's bugado in your sukuriputo.

>>52042
>>52043
I thought both replies were Astaroth.

It was pretty interesting that way.

Wow, I ended up missing the whole conversation because I went to pick up a figure from the post office. That's somehow incredibly fitting.

I'll just throw in my opinion and say that, in the modern world, actual love is a rare thing. It's used and manipulated just to make a profit out of it (see: Valentines Day), portrayed in popular movies and the like as inherently sexual in nature, and most often confused with simple lust because of people's lack of an ability to make a proper distinction between the two.
It can exist, though, and something as trivial as distance or dimension can't stand in the way of it when it does. That's why I love my perfect 2D woman.

>>52040
I said it didn't I ? Love is like magic.
To make a simpler comparison of what I think, do you remember in EP4 how Maria was able to create happiness out of nothing ?
That's basically what I see humans did with our biological needs and the stuff I mentioned. And like I said, it doesn't nullify the beauty of the illusion itself.

>>52046

It's true, I don't think Lili would have argued the same thing a few years ago.

>>52043
Well, the discussion also got away from my original topic of "do you think online relationships can be real," so there's that~

I'm sorry that my comments came across as personal attacks, I can only reiterate that I didn't mean them as such and I'll do my best to avoid similar ones on the future~ I do try to keep any serious discussion I do here somewhat light-hearted, I mean, it is an anime image board after all~ Though even though I like to joke about it, that doesn't mean I don't take it seriously too (just like my sentences with tildes can also be completely serious)~

It's part of my nature, I guess, to try and stay upbeat and joking no matter the situation~ Well, I shouldn't say "no matter the situation" because obviously there are some cases where it wouldn't be appropriate, but you get the idea~

I'd just like to note that I imagine sometimes my posts may seem like they're coming from some delusional opium addict, and I wouldn't mind if someone called me on it, but I probably wouldn't assume they actually thought I was an abuser~ Reminds me of a particular comment in a certain game where one player's play was described as that of a "methed up hippo with severe ADD"~

In any case, I'm done with this. Have fun and all that, later.

>>52049
I never noticed Mion transforms into ANGE there.

This reminded me of the sixteen hour debate times.

It's Umineko related because it's love.

I think it's time for bed. Good night /seacats/.

>>52054
Everyone's leaving now. Boring.

>>52055

>>52056
I love you, Chen.

>>52054
Just remember to love the 2D and you'll have taken the most important lesson from it all.
I haven't even taken in most of it yet because my brain is moving at the speed of slow due to tiredness. I really need sleep, but I have food cooking, so I'll collapse in like half an hour probably.

>>52057
Back off. She's mine.

>>52059
Looks like I wasn't quite fast enough.

Fine, you win.

Huh.

I've been up for way too long.

Night nerds.

>>52041
Was busy with a game of LoL. I'm apparently Shurelia's new BFF, and as such I'm spotlighted on her stream during duos.

>>52063
. . .

Shurelia. . .

SHURELIA!?

SUHSEIOJHRHSEOE;HA[PKLTSELJP[TKEJPIYGIYGUTF7FT7F7FTUTFUTF

>>52060
That's more like it

Also, Misha, Rotho and Jyouji, up for CiV this night ?

>>52064
She added me after a game we played in ranked due to my summoner name. And also the jokes like "My hips are moving on their own!" and "Kingu GAINA". Get jelly.

>>52066
What did I do to deserve this , god.

>>52065
Sure. I think I got this "army" thing down now.

>>52063
>>52064
Shurelia?

>>52069
http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Miyuki_%27Shurelia%27_Mitsuhashi

>>52070
oic

>>52065
>>52068
Sure, I'll play later on~ Also, allow me to link a quick guide that helped me out on Emperor level, currently dominating a game as Babylon~

Damn it, as soon I died on my bed you guys post 1 1/2 threads. It took me a while to read it ... oh well, even if it's too late now:

>>51972
>You don't love a girl because she's "nice", you love her because she makes you feel appreciated and valued.
Nope. Just because most of the humans are fake and cheap it doesn't mean love doesn't exist.
>>51976
I kinda agree with you, except with a part. Actions do really speak louder than words. I think the biggest issue in any relationship is trust. And as you said, words can easily deceive others. Well, I'm not denying your point, but I believe the quote wasn't correctly used in this context.
>>52014
Happy birthday Chen!

>>52073
Well, they also say "the pen is mightier than the sword"~

>>52074
I believe that the "sword" in that sentence refer to aggresivity, or "lack of planning", though.

>>52073
Are people just intentionally doing this now? My point wasn't that "love doesn't exist". Seriously.

>>52076
I totally misunderstood your point then, sorry. What was it then? Most people don't care about love?

>>52077
... Was I really that hard to follow?

>>52078
Maybe it was just me? I had to read it kinda fast. I will check it again.
I can't really tell if you are being ironic or unsincere, but here are a few points you made:

>Sex is the sole defining factor of a "love" relationship. All "love" is built from raging lust.
>What's love but another narcissistic expression?
>You never love a person for who they are, you love them for how they make you feel and who you are when you're with them
> I just think humans are naturally focused on the ego, as all actions we take are meant to improve ourselves, our opinions of ourselves or our abilities. "Love" is just another rung on that ladder where you find someone who reinforces and strengthens the image of yourself, rather than looking for someone who's nice or whatever.

I don't agree with any of them as general rules, but I will accept that most of the people seem to act like that.

>>52079
The first point is in response to "do relationships need physical contact", which my answer to was "Yes, they need sex", because a lot of "love" relationships are built on the idea that cock goes in somewhere. Look at popular media, you'll see "love" advertised as "lust".

I also argue that love is focused on how you feel when you are around someone,
therefore love is narcissistic as you love how you feel when you're with them (that's a lot of 'you'), and we participate in "love" because it strengthens our positive image of ourselves through affectations from the object of your love.

I don't see how you gleaned "love doesn't exist" or "people are fake" or "people don't care about love" from any of that.

>>52080
Well that's because of the definition of "love". You are saying love = ego boost & lust, but I refuse to accept such a definition. I think that should be called "teenager love" or "popular media bullshit". However as you say, that's how it seems to work for most people.

>>52081
You talk as if "ego boost" is a negative thing.

>>52082
It is. It's wrong to be in a relationship for the mere "ego boost & bed rent". In my opinion, at least.

Ohaaaa

>>52083
Can't tell if intentional. "Love isn't due to how the other person is but because of how they make you feel" -> "you only love someone to stroke your ego". You're giving a motivation to love someone, I'm giving what I think is the entire thing love is.

>>52084
Hey there.
>>52085
I will respect your opinion, but I won't accept it. If this is a my opinion vs your opinion I guess we can let this argument die and continue with something more productive, ne.

>>52086
I'm saying that you're twisting my words.

You got the wrong idea. I wasn't scolding you, or even calling you wrong, but rather trying to give you a new perspective ne.