At 6:00 PM on October 4th, Ushiromiya Maria received a letter from the Golden Witch, Beatrice.

The witch was immediately escorted to the VIP room upon arrival. At dinner, the adults discussed who this 19th-person Beatrice could have been. They were simply outraged at the witch's letter. When the knocked on Kinzo's door asking for answers, he told them to go away, and they left unsatisfied.

Thus ends the first day, Octover 4th, 1986

The next morning, six people had gone missing, and there was a huge uproar.

First Twilight:
Gohda: pale skin, found in the Storehouse
George: torso slice in half, found in the Storehouse
Jessica: burnt, found in the Storehouse
Kyrie: head half-smashed, found in the Storehouse
Genji: hole in chest, found in the Storehouse
Eva: decapitated, found in the Storehouse


The Storehouse's key was found inside the storehouse. When they discover the crime scene, the Storehouse's door was locked.

>>3155
Then how their bodies was discovered?

Maybe a Master Key could open the Storehouse's door.

>>3159
There is a key's copy, but the only one who possesses it is an innocent person.

And, about your blue: The only key that can lock and unlock the storehouse is Storehouse's Key.

Then repeat for me:
Their all dead. No fake bodies, no fake deads, no "personalities" deads trick.

>>3162
Toshiro Gohda is dead
Ushiromiya George is dead
Ushiromiya Jessica is dead
Ushiromiya Kyrie is dead
Ronoue Genji is dead
Ushiromiya Eva is dead.

Those bodies are real. None of them had many different personalities and they are really dead.

>>3163
Repeat in red.

No accomplices or the culprit touched or used the Storehouse's keys (original and copy) before the First Twilight.

The headless body does not belong to Ushiromiya Eva, who actually killed all of them through some cunning method. Her body's left there to confuse people into thinking she died. She later died due to accident or occurence X.

>>3165
Her being 'the', of course, which is a real body but not Eva's body. If you'd like to form a response, I'd be pleased with knowing no one else died but the six mentioned, and the bodies are not only real but also belong to the person they are believed to belong to.

>>3165
It remembers me "The Secret Garden", from G.K. Chesterton...

>>3164
The only thing I can repeat is: Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice before First Twilight. I have magical powers... Why me and my furnitures should use some stupid key?

>>3165
The headless body belongs to Eva. Actually, Eva's head was found inside the Storehouse.

>>3168
Wunderbar. Prior to the murders, the storehouse door was not locked! In fact, the storehouse door was not locked at any point in time, though it may have been believed to have been locked! Thus, this is not a locked room murder at all.

>>3168
Then, you could repeat that too:

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice after First Twilight.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice in exact moment of victim's deaths.

>>3169
When all six people got in the Storehouse, the door was locked.

>>3170
Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice after First Twilight.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice in exact moment of victim's deaths.

As I thought. Then, please repeat:

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent after First Twilight.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent before First Twilight.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent in exact moment of victim's deaths.

The six people gathered on Storehouse were dead before they were enter.

>>3173
The innocent person that possesses Storehouse's key copy used it for open Storehouse's door when they discovered the crime scene.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent before First Twilight..

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent in exact moment of victim's deaths.


The six people were killed inside Storehouse.

>>3174
Before the First Twilight, the Storehouse's door was opened. So the culprit or an accomplished could kill them all and just close the door without locked it. However, an innocent with the Storehouse's copy key could lock the door after the First Twilight, without open it and discover corpses.

>>3175
Only the victims got in the storehouse when they were locked and killed. They were killed by someone outside the storehouse.

And, for my pleasure: The victims got in the Storehouse with the original key.

In short: Me and my magic did this crime. Isn't it beatiful?

>>3176
My lady, there is nothing like "beauty" in death of innocents.

As you say, they get killed while the Storehouse's Door is closed and lock. Correct?

>>3177
Yes, correct. A closed room wouldn't be a closed room if the door is not closed and locked.

>>3178
Since this moment, the door has not opened, unlocked or picked, I'm correct again?

And traps didn't killed the six people on the First Twilight.

>>3180
The Storehouse's door was only opened again, before First Twilight, when everyone discovered the crime scene.

Also, you are correct: No traps and no medicine (drugs, poison, etc) killed anyone.

>>3181
The Storehouse's door was only opened again, after First Twilight, when everyone discovered the crime scene.**

>>3182
In exact moment of the First Twilight, the six people were unconscious.

In exact moment of the First Twilight, there were more than six people in the Storehouse.

There's no windows or secret passages.

Van Dine e Knox does not applies in this game.

>>3183
Van Dine AND Knox

>>3183
In exact moment of the First Twilight, the six people were conscious.

In exact moment of the First Twilight, there were only six people in the Storehouse.

There is no secret passage, but there is a veeeeeeery little window in Storehouse.
The storehouse's window can only be closed by inside.
No one inside of the storehouse locked the window.
The culprit or accomplice didn't use any method to unlock the window. Except magic, because I'm a sorcerer.
When they found the crime scene, the window was locked.

And about Knox and Van Dine, I'm not gonna say anything. You have to discover by yourself!

>>3186
Then repeat: The window never was opened since the start of the game, before and after the First Twilight.

>>3187
The window was never opened since the start of the game, before and after the First Twilight.

I am ready for listen your theory, if you prepared one. Try to kill this Ilusion!

>>3188

But, if you want a theory:

They killed each other, manipulated by the culprit or an accomplice.

The Storehouse's Door was locked from inside, by the original key.

The culprit did not killing the six people "in person", he just manipulated the events, so they could kill each other easily.

The culprit and any accomplices did not killing anyone "in person" since the very start of this game.

>>3190
The six people didn't kill each other. They were killed by somone else, in this case, me.
The Storehouse was locked from outside.
The Culprit/Accomplice killed everyone "in person".

>>3191
So...

The Culprit/Accomplice killed everyone "in person" from outside of Storehouse. Near Storehouse, to be exactly.

The Culprit/Accomplice didn't locked the Storehouse. When he comes, it already locked.

>>3192
Your first blue is correct. Isn't wonderful what magic can do? About your second one: WRONG! The Culprit/Accomplice locked the door!

Now you ask me: "How?"
I say: "Magi, duuuh!"

>>3193
Assuming your Red Truths, the Culprit/Accomplice don't used any key to lock the door, and even so, he locked.

I suppose this is correct too?

>>3194
As I said:
The only key that can lock and unlock the storehouse is Storehouse's Key.
The Storehouse's key was found inside the storehouse and wasn't used to lock the door.
There is a key's copy, but the only one who possesses it is an innocent person. Also, the innocent person wasn't stolen and she/he did not give the key to the culprit/accomplice by any method.

What do you think? Surprise me with a theory!

>>3195
With this Red: The only key that can lock and unlock the storehouse is Storehouse's Key.

Are you assuming the Storehouse's Key found inside the Storehouse is the only key who that can open lock and unlock the door?

>>3196
The Storehouse's Key copy can lock and unlock the door too.

Can't you find a theory to blow in my face, Piorot-san? I think you gonna sleep forever and ever in this closed room!

Repeat: The Storehouse's Key copy didn't lock and unlock the door until the very start of this game, before and after the First Twilight.

>>3198
The Storehouse's Key copy didn't lock and unlock the door until the very start of this game, before the First Twilight.

You know very well that the Storehouse's key copy was used after First Twilight, to unlock Storehouse's door when everyone discovered the crime scene.

>>3199
>>3154
The Storehouse's key copy was used ONLY after First Twilight, to unlock Storehouse's door when everyone discovered the crime scene.

Could you repeat that?

>>3200
The Storehouse's key copy was used ONLY after First Twilight, to unlock Storehouse's door when everyone discovered the crime scene. Happy, now, Poirot-san?

The only key that can lock and unlock the storehouse is Storehouse's Key.

The Storehouse's Key copy didn't lock and unlock the door until the very start of this game, before the First Twilight.

The Storehouse's key copy was used ONLY after First Twilight, to unlock Storehouse's door when everyone discovered the crime scene.

Then, a key doesn't used for lock the Storehouse's door.

Could describe the door? It's a normal door?

>>3202
Like VN and anime, this is the Storehouse's door in my Rokkenjima.

Now, about your blue: Show me your theory, Poirot-san. If that two keys wasn't used to lock the door, what was used? Also, remember: Storehouse's key is the only thing that can lock and unlock Storehouse's door.

>>3203
[Also, remember: Storehouse's key is the only thing that can lock and unlock Storehouse's door.]

That's not what you said. Your red says: The only key that can lock and unlock the storehouse is Storehouse's Key.

But in my cases, so many things were used to lock doors.

So, a accomplice/culprit could use Thieves' Tools or using even "duct tape", "sealing" the door like Eva's trick in EP1. It could be used some kind of obstacle, like boxes or the door could be damage somewhere to a "forced lock".

Thus, a accomplice or a culprit didn't use keys to lock the Guesthouse's door, but any device or stratagem.

>>3204
Thus, a accomplice or a culprit didn't use keys to lock the STOREhouse's door, but any device or stratagem.

>>3204
Good, good! However, I said that 'Storehouse's key is the only key that can lock and unlock the door' for avoid Master Key's theory.

Now I can say the beatiful truth:

Both Storehouse's Key (original and copy) are the only thing that can lock and unlock Storehouse's door!!

How do you feel about that? *ahaha.wav*

>>3207

Innocent didn't used the key as follows.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent before First Twilight..

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Innocent in exact moment of victim's deaths.

There is a key's copy, but the only one who possesses it is an innocent person.

The innocent person that possesses Storehouse's key copy used it for open Storehouse's door when they discovered the crime scene.

There is a key's copy, but the only one who possesses it is an innocent person. Also, the innocent person wasn't stolen and she/he did not give the key to the culprit/accomplice by any method.

Culprit and Accomplice touched, but didn't used the key... EXCEPT before the First Twilight. As follows:

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice after First Twilight.

Both Storehouse's key (original and copy) weren't used by any Culprit and/or Accomplice in exact moment of victim's deaths.

So, the innocent person isn't the key's owner. The Key's Owner is the culprit or a accomplice. Then, after the crime, the innocent possess the key. The Innocent hadn't stolen or gave the key, he just received.

Can you deny it?

The storehouse door was removed while it was locked and then put back on, so therefore people could enter even while the storehouse door was locked, and then after it was put back on it was still locked.

>>3208
The Innocent hadn't stolen, wasn't stoled or gave the key, he just received it.

>>3208
Your 1st and 2nd blues are correct! And I understand that the 4th red is an exception in your blue theory.

Your 3rd blue is more than wrong. The real owner of Storehouse's key copy isn't the culprit and/or the accomplice!

>>3209
The storehouse's door wasn't removed.

>>3212
I preferred to find the culprit without deny you, but...

Your red:

Both Storehouse's Key (original and copy) are the only thing that can lock and unlock Storehouse's door!!

Accordingly, magic it is not a thing that can lock and unlock Storehouse's door, so you can not commite this crime!

>>3213
.................................................................................................................... Fine! You just destroyed my "Storehouse door mystery"!

But... Well... Can you destroy the others mysteries involving this closed room?
- Gohda's pale skin
- Jessica's burnt body
- Eva's decapitated body
- Storehouse window's mystery

Try to solve it, dear Poirot-san!

>>3214
For a corpse, nothing more natural than being pale skinned. That explains the pale skin of Gohda-san.

To Jessica, I need to know about her clothes. Her clothes were burntoo?

Eva could be decapitated by some large and keen edged weapon.

And the what kind of mystery has the Storehouse's window could get?

It's closed by inside, didn't it?

>>3215
Your first blue hits.
Jessica's entire body is burnt, including clothes.
Eva wasn't decapitated by an edge weapon.

Here, read >>3186
It'll explain the Window's mystery.

>>3217
The windows was locked before the people gathered on the storehouse's door.

Eva is literally decapitated.

Jessica is literally burnt.

>>3219
The window was locked before all people die.
Eva is literally decapitated.

Jessica is literally burnt. (Like Kinzo at all EPs)

The window was locked at the start of the game, and it was never unlocked, it was locked before everyone gathered inside as Poirot said.

Jessica was brunt in the boiler.

Jessica's body was set on fire.

Eva was decapitated with wire, due to the intense speed the wire pulling on her neck, it cleaved it off.

>>3229
As I said earlier, the window was locked before the six people died.

Jessica wasn't burnt in the boiler room. Jessica was burnt in the Storehouse. Also, you're correct about Jessica's body was set on fire.

Eva wasn't decapitated with a wire.

>>3220
>>3230
The window was locked AFTER all people die.***

>>3230
Eva was decapitated by a foot. Someone stomped on her neck until her head broke off.

>The culprit or accomplice didn't use any method to unlock the window

Someone else unlocked the window, one of the victims probably. Then the culprit or accomplice locked the window.

Also was Eva's decapitation a clean cut, or was it more messy.

>>3232
Eva wasn't decapitated by a foot. The decapitation was very messy.

About locking the window:
Yes, one of the victims unlocked the window, however the culprit or accomplice didn't use any method to lock the window.

>>3233
>The storehouse's window can only be closed by inside.
>No one inside of the storehouse locked the window.
>The culprit or accomplice didn't use any method to unlock the window
>the culprit or accomplice didn't use any method to lock the window.

Clarify something for me.

The culprit did not lock the window by any means.
Nothing the culprit did caused the window to get locked.

An accomplice did not lock the window.

Nothing an accomplice did caused the window to get locked.

Nothing any of the victims did caused the window to be locked.

>>3234
The culprit did not lock the window by any means.
Nothing the culprit did caused the window to get locked.
An accomplice did not lock the window.

I refuse to repeat your two last blues.

Ok good, now your definition on what an 'edged weapon' is.

>>3236
I asked to Poirot-san what is an "edge weapon" and he said that a edge weapon is weapon with blade (razor, knife, sword, etc).

>>3237
So would an axe fit in your version of that definition?

>>3238
Yes.

>>3239
Her head was beaten off her neck by a blunt weapon.

The accomplice set it up so that after Jessica burned for a while the window locked, using string/wire/rope/etc.

>>3240
>The accomplice set it up

You mean, a trap? If is that what I am think, I say: None of the six people weren't kill by a trap.

>>3241
Not sure if I would call it a trap. Just a method to lock the window. Doesn't harm anyone, since they are already dead before it is set up.

A timed device which made it so the window locked after X period of time.

>>3242
A time device wasn't used to lock the window.

>>3243
An animal bit Eva's head off.

>>3244
An animal didn't do it.

>>3245
Eva's head was ripped off by a hook.

Eva's head was ripped off by use of a large vacuum.

Eva's head was blown off by a bomb.

>>3246
None of this things decapitated Eva.

Also, about your blunt weapon blue: Eva's head wasn't beaten off her neck by a blunt weapon.

>>3247
I'll need only one last Blue.

An Innocent could be a Killer, without be a accomplice or the culprit.

>>3278
Your blue hits. Where did you get this blue? From Gaap's dimensional hole?

I just needed a caffeine dose to start.

So, the Innocent who possess the key copy of Storehouse's Door killed the six people.

The Innocent was manipulated by the culprit or an accomplice.

The real culprit is alive.

>>3280
The innocent who possesses the Storehouse's key copy didn't kill any of those 6 people.
The innocent wasn't manipulated by culprit and or accomplice.

The culprit is still alive.

>>3281
A Culprit/An Accomplice cannot be an Innocent at differents times in this gameboard.

The Culprit is always the Culprit, don't matter points of view.

The Accomplices are always the Accomplices, don't matter points of view.

The Innocents are always the Innocents, don't matter points of view.

>>3282
A Culprit/An Accomplice cannot be an Innocent at differents times in this gameboard.
The Culprit is always the Culprit, don't matter points of view.
The Accomplices are always the Accomplices, don't matter points of view.

I refuse to repeat your last blue.

An Innocent can be any another thing when he kills someone, except the Culprit or Accomplice!

>>3284
An Innocent can be any another thing when he kills someone, except The Culprit or Accomplice.

You refused to repeat that blue truth because you assume "Innocents" who kill aren't Innocents anymore.

>>3286
The Innocents are always the Innocents, don't matter points of view.
An Innocent can be any another thing when he kills someone, except The Culprit or Accomplice.

Those two sentences doesn't have any contradictions. If I repeat in red your blue, a contradiction is going to exist and this gameboard will crash.

>>3287
Exactly, EVA-san.

So, the Innocent can change his innocent status and Culprit & Accomplice cannot. The Innocent cannot be a Culprit or a Accomplice, no matter what. So, there's one more category, who you're hiding for us.

>>3288
And I thought that no one was going to discover this. But this does not destroy my 1st Twilight's Ilusion.

>>3289
My lady, you still don't understand. I'm not a "destroyer of illusions". And I don't have an "Imagine Breaker" power.

Even I, Hercule Poirot, could believe in magic or witches, as a Roman Catholic.

But, beliefs apart, I'm a Detective. My work is not deny you, but catch a Culprit and bring him to the authorities.

And I will make all my efforts to do it, Eva-san!

So, repeat! A non-Innocent, non-accomplice and non-culprit can help the Culprit in his goals. Even him doesn't know that![/b]

The culprit was let in by the victims. One of victims then locked the entrance he entered. The culprit killed them and then hid in the storehouse .

>>3290
A non-Innocent, non-accomplice and non-culprit can help the Culprit in his goals, even if him doesn't know that.

Well, you can make how many question you want: You'll never find The Culprit if we get in First Twilight forever.

>>3292
I agree with you. But there is another people who wants destroy your illusion. So, I need to sit and wait, trying get all informations I can.

A Culprit and an Accomplice can "help" an Innocent to turn himself a non-Innocent.

Without this help, an Innocent cannot turn himself a non-Innocent.

>>3291
The six victims got in the Storehouse and then the door was closed and locked by outside.
All six people were murdered by outside.

>>3293
Your two blues hit. Have you ever think in work on SSVD or Eiserne Jungfrau? You are pretty excelent. +20 for you.

I'm sure you are a excellent game master.

So... A non-innocent, non-accomplice and non-culprit is a Manipulated person.

The Six People on the First Twilight didn't died at same time.

The Six People on the First Twilight didn't came on the Storehouse at same time.

There is a gap time between each death on the First Twilight.

The Culprit killed the six people "in person", out from Storehouse, without accomplices' help.

>>3295
A non-innocent, non-accomplice and non-culprit isn't a Manipulated person.
The Six People on the First Twilight get in the Storehouse at same time.

Your 2nd and 4th blues hit.
I refuse to repeat your last blue.

>>3296
Some of the six people didn't saw each other die when alive.

Some of the six people didn't aware about their number (six) or didn't know who was with them exactly.

The window has a autolock.

In other words it's the type of window that I thought was in Kinjo's DR game, where the window will lock itself if you let go of it due to gravity.

>>3297
All six people kneew who was with them and all of them kneew how many people were.

Tell more about your first blue.

>>3298
The window hasn't an autolock.

>>3299
Repeat it: "An accomplice cannot kill."
"No accidents are involved in this murder."

The window was removed.

>>3301
I refuse to repeat your first sentence.
No accidents are involved in this murder. Also, the window wasn't removed and, before you say something, there is only one window in Storehouse.

>>3302
The accomplice was not one of the victims.