>>
|
No. 216
>>198
I am not going to bother citing articles, interviews, the manga or what have you, as I am essentially a French Formalist: What you see is what you get. Instead, I will try my hardest to give you an adequate explanation of what happened.
You are correct, in a sense. People did stop thinking, and the interpretation that it is because of some insanity regarding different Game Masters in the meta-world is nonsensical, however, it is still very likely that Yasu is the culprit because of what is said of the culprit and her means in Our Confession. If you view that Our Confession is as much a part of Umineko as Game 1 or 8, as I do, a view which I will now explain, things should become more clear.
Here's an assumption for you: Umineko is a deconstruction of the mystery genre. More specifically, it is a deconstruction of the Golden Age of Mystery, which features ideas such as the detective proclaiming "A-ha! I have solved the mystery." Reader beware, you're in for a spoiler if you turn that page... and this is a feature of the mystery genre which is mentioned several times throughout Umineko. While we are left without a traditional "answer" in the main bulk of the game, Our Confession provides us an answer that works in every single game board: Yasu is the culprit, and she has the resources to hire accomplices.
I now pose you the following idea: What if Ryukishi decided that while the answer is best left unread (a warning given at the start of Our Confession,) given as this is a mystery, and not a fantasy, he was obligated to provide an answer anyway? Would he not take all possible precautions to separate this answer from the rest of the games? You have to go looking for Our Confession, it isn't just there for you to read, within the bookbinding of the rest of the game. In that sense, Umineko even deconstructs this idea of turning the page and reading the "answer" to solve the culprit.
To cut to the chase, I think the fact that Our Confession is deliberately segregated from the main story legitimizes the answer provided within; it is the "answer" that a person can expect to find within any standard detective novel. If you can buy into this idea, the better question to ask is "Why are other theories even necessary?" Why does it matter if Kanon and Shannon could not be in the same room? This theory can serve as a proper explanation 100% of the time! Truly, it lives up to its reputation as an insidious, gut-splattering work, if one is to read it with this interpretation.
However, if you want a more "in-context" answer to your question, the lines of thinking for why they are able to appear before Erika in Game 5, but refuse to later, should actually be as follows:
- The scenes where they do appear together are a work of fiction and falsehood; they are the Witch Side's attempt at obfuscating the truth from the reader.
- There is some other reason as to why they cannot/ refuse to appear together at the same time.
If you refuse to believe in Shkannon theory, then that latter option might be "Kanon and Shannon simply prefer to avoid each other, and every instance where they appeared to like one another was as fictional as the media's depiction of the Ushiromiya family." A more silly answer might be that Battler made an off-color remark about Shannon's boobs while Kanon was around, but not in earshot of Shannon, and when George turned around to ask him about it, he blamed Kanon, causing Shannon to dislike him. They may very well not even be "brother" and "sister" as they seem to view each other. Perhaps they hated each other. Who can say? There is simply no more evidence to support any such claim.
Lastly: While I do believe that it is very much possible that Our Confession is the be-all-end-all solution to Umineko, I am left so dissatisfied with the taste it leaves in my mouth, that I think it is a legitimate and noble pursuit for the reader to continue solving the mystery irrespective of its declarations, and I encourage you to as well. As another disclaimer, I too loathe the idea of Shkannon, for reasons I shall not delve into here; I have a terrible headache, and I'm sure my writing skills have suffered for it. As a parting note, I advise you never stop thinking, and more importantly, do not lose faith; the loss of faith necessitates that you will stop thinking. Perhaps you have already stopped, having drawn the line at the word "overthinking," and I am simply too late.
|