>>39089
Dont worry~~
taste some Oishii tacos~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O2nPSddhJg

>>39078
>>39078
That's exactly what I expected someone to say. Of course, I'm the only one with secrets. I'm sorry for expecting everyone to be a mirror image of me.

>while I agree that there is the social need to hide specific parts of yourself to others and present your most agreeable self to that specific audience
And that's the only thing I really meant to assert. Don't be bothered by statements only meant for impact. You said you use a name because you have nothing to hide, when really you have plenty to hide because you have a name. Of course, like I said, me not having a name here means nothing. Everyone has to know who everyone is, and everyone and their furniture has access to mod powers to do so. So there's no hiding. In the first place, you can't hide anywhere. There's always going to be a couple of people who can see, you just hope you're lost in the masses in a ratio of 1000:1 for users and mods, so that what you say isn't given any notice.

>What you're describing is "speaking one's mind" and suffering the consequences. You're shirking the responsibility for the things you say.
Not quite. That's why I didn't want to use the holding tongue term. Usually, that refers to holding back what you think to avoid hurting others, which only indirectly affects your standing. What I actually meant was holding the truth back about yourself. Revealing that does it directly.

Now , who deleted that post? I saved it ne~

>>39093
Sacred logs, post it, etc.

>>39093
You saw it? My typo? I'm afraid I can't let you leave this place alive.

>>39092
Don't go down the victim spiel now. Everyone has secrets, you're soliciting a known reaction now.

>You said you use a name because you have nothing to hide,
That's you failing to read, actually. I said I have a name so I don't need to hide, whereby I referred to the act of hiding who I am so I can go off scot-free saying what I please!

Hiding truths about one's self is about as typical as crying when you're a baby. In short, you're conjecturing about the obvious and presenting it as some clarifying point of view that opens eyes: it isn't.

This is why I call you pretentious: you assert some "truths" as if they are really hidden knowledge you happened to tap into, where it's a truth just about everyone knows but doesn't discuss because everyone knows.

The truly pretentious discuss the obvious and pretend it's new. This, too, is pretentious.

>>39095
Chen sees everything.

I am the truth itself.

I am Chen.

>>39089
I didn't say it was bad to do things to get people to attend to you~ that's what you spin it into.

>>39096
>>39096
>Hiding truths about one's self is about as typical as crying when you're a baby. In short, you're conjecturing about the obvious and presenting it as some clarifying point of view that opens eyes: it isn't.
And this is exactly why you like calling people pretentious and pseudo-intellectual. "Hey kid, you think you're intelligent and deep? Everyone already knows that stuff already."

Why don't you take a look at what I said?
>I'm sorry if the way I phrase it is overly dramatic, but it's just the truth everyone knows.
>it's just the truth everyone knows.

>>39091
I didn't knew you liked oiishi tacos.

Do you like some other dishes?

>>39097
Because she's the hero Seacats deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So, we'll hunt him, because she can take it. Because she's not our hero. She's a silent guardian. A watchful protector. A Chen.

>>39099
That was in response to "humans are despicable creatures", not "everyone hides".

You responded to:
>>39068

Which only talks about humans being despicable~

>>39098
I don't believe that I did, but if you say that I did, then there must be some truth to it.

>>39053
Well, I don't think that's true. And I don't think Lambda would impersonate people right now!

>>39101
In any case, I love calling out pretentious people because they need a blow to the head and realise that for all their pseudo-intellectual pretence at genius, they're really the same as everyone else. And while I can effect neither, I do love letting them know what I think of them.

>>39103
He would use multiple avatars like now~
but never impersonate~

>>39102
Then why call it "badmouthing"~?

You guys really suck at being detectives.

>>39101
And I said not to take statements only meant for impact seriously. I wanted to say that people hide, people being despicable. I wasn't trying to reinforce the latter, but the former.

Obviously, people hide because other people would find the things they hide despicable, at least publicly, even if they felt the same way privately.

Don't make a strawman out of me by insulting me based on things you've speculated that I think.

>>39106
Because it just hurts me, is all.

No really , you guys REALLY suck.

>>39108
I take all statements in a given discussion serious. There is no room for "I'm saying this because impact": say things because you think they are true, not because you think they will grab people's attention or have impact. If you think it was both true and would grab attention, congratulations, you got mine. It's still pretentious to declare people are "despicable", because they aren't.

Of course there are parts you'd rather keep hidden, but that doesn't meant they're despicable, nor does it mean people will find them despicable.

This is the viewpoint I contest and find dumb. People are wonderful and fantastic things.

>>39110
Come now, did people honestly not know who it was from the start~? I didn't even have to check IPs~

>>39110
Ojou-sama I think you should stop.

>>39109
Right! And are you hurt because you think I was saying bad things of you or attributing you with negative traits, or were you hurt because I attributed a trait to you?

>>39110
It sucks to be me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIJJxL9utow

>>39114
Both.
Why do you ask?

>>39111
That's the part you find pretentious? Even though you said that stating the obvious as if it's genius is pretentious? That doesn't even make sense. I won't try to challenge it, because I don't mind if you think I'm pretentious for saying that. It's clearly not the right word to use.

There's no 1:1 translation of thoughts to words, obviously, so nobody reads words and then comes to understand exactly what the person thought and felt while writing them. Different words have different connotations.

I won't say I don't find people despicable, exactly. I think the kind of hypocrisy that makes people shun others when they're entirely honest about themselves, even when they share the same traits, is just that. If you think people are fine despite that, I won't stop you. Even though I said those things, I don't hate people.

>>39112
It's not like I was even trying to hide who I was.

>>39116
Isn't it obvious? I don't think attributing someone a trait in itself is that hurtful, unless you think it's a negative trait, and "getting people to look at you" isn't a negative trait in my book.

So! What I'm saying is you shouldn't take it as something hurtful when it wasn't meant as such. That's silly and getting yourself more pain than is needed. Especially if it's something I've said, because we don't get along, so clearly I am always wrong about you.

>>39118
What a troll.

>>39117
Then let's agree to disagree! I'm sorry if I offended you overmuch: I admit I wanted to offend you a little but not to the point where we can no longer talk.

>>39119
I'm not even lying.
I'm being so sincere right now.
Even though you called me wrong and argued.

>>39118
I think I can't really help how I feel, but if you say so.

>>39120
You don't need to apologize, because you probably only insulted me as much as you wanted to, and I already knew it was in your nature to insult me like this, so my impression of you didn't change. And I meant to insult you as well, in the same way.

I just get a little tired of being called pretentious, because it happens a lot. There are certain realities about me that make it ridiculous for me to think highly of myself, some of which I've already specified, the rest of which I'll leave to the imagination so as not to damage my standing.

>>39124
In that case, I apologise for calling you pretentious. Being a naturally arrogant and self-centred person, I can't help but think I am a good person; I tend to assume everyone has the same view about themselves despite continuous evidence that I am plainly wrong. It was not at all my intention to step on your self-esteem, so I will not call you pretentious again.

If ever I do so again, call me out on it. I don't want to make promises and not keep them.

>>39125
If I'm pretentious, that means I have high self-esteem that could be damaged by someone bursting my bubble, but that would only bring me down to size.

You can't damage the self-esteem of someone who won't believe they're pretentious by calling them pretentious. So that's not why it's offensive. It's because I don't like it when people think that I think I'm better than I am. I've said it before, but I believe I have a pretty clear understanding of where I stand. In fact, the people who call me pretentious might even have a higher view of me than I do.

Well guys, I need your opinion (I already heard Cirno and Chen)
Most of you know that I had a Relly serious problem one year ago with certain spanish site.....
and I am doing my best to forget while accepting that that happened.

So I came to the resolution of blocking that site and blocking all the spanish anime related sites to that site, So that I can forget about them so that I can walk forward while leaving that behind.....however by leaving all that behind....I made the hard desicion of leaving friends behind....Althought they are my friends. If I keep lurking I will remember things I dont want to remember I cant forget the fact that I hurted them seriously....
and the question that I am asking myself are:

Did I do the best thing?
Was the best solution blocking those sites?
was that healthy?

>>39127
Oh no, you said you were a girl when actually you're a guy.

That doesn't matter. Exactly what significance does gender have over the internet? Did people fall in love with you?

Romantic relationships over the internet should stay on the internet, because people don't ever love you, they only love the image they have of you. Of course, the same goes for real life relationships. The point is that the image they'd get of you in real life is very different from the image they'd get over the internet, so they'd be loving two separate people. Now that we've established that, the problem of gender only applies to the physical world where the differences can be perceived, which is a place internet relationships can't go.

And if nobody fell in love with you, I fail to see the problem.

>>39127
msn

>>39126
I think you're a great person who's good at acting and dramatics, has a critical mind, can put things in poetic ways, is good at writing and is sometimes a little lonely. In short, I think you're a perfectly wonderful person just like everyone else.

>>39127
>Did I do the best thing?

The most complicated question. You should answer that by yourself. But if you allow me an opinion...

No, I don't think so. It is healthy to forget and let go that Spanish sites, but not block them. If you reach the point to need block, we get a serious problem.

More: if you had friends there, you shouldn't abandon them. Add them in your IM. Turn them your personal friends. Forget the sites, but don't forget your friends.

Lion-san, you are a kind person. I can say that because whenever you appear, you treat well me and everyone as well. Maybe leave these people can hurt you.

I do not know you well and I did not have any rights to speak anything but think about it, okay?

Get better, nipah~

>>39130
You'll make me blush. I won't try to argue otherwise because I hate being seen as someone playing the victim as well. Before, I was just being sarcastic, implying that it wasn't just me, rather than demanding sympathy by saying that it really is.

>>39132
Look, bro, even if you told me you were doing all that because you're a whiny faggot who wants my attention, I still think you're not a whiny faggot but someone who can accomplish good things when he puts his mind to it.

>>39127
If you hurt them, but still want to be with them, you can take the easy way out and block them or walk the hard path and reconcile. If they refuse your reconciliation efforts, screw 'em, you did your best.

>>39133
Insecurities? piece is moe

>>39133
>>39131
>>39129
>>39128
I will follow your advice, and I think that after reading your comments, I have been foolish, Ehmm my response will sound dull compared to your advice but really , I will try to settle things with some of them, trying to contact those that are still my friends......and finally say to the inquisition:You are not the boss of me now~.

>>39133
That's nice to know. And as I implied before, of course I want attention. I believe most people do. Without any attention, they'd feel isolated.

There are also probably few people who can truly believe everyone is wonderful. After all, there are people who do terrible things by the standards of most. Then again, I think that there's nothing anyone can do that puts them beyond redemption, because people can genuinely change so that they'd no longer even dream of repeating their terrible actions again. But few are that forgiving. Oh well. It's not something to dwell on.

>>39136
I like being horribly naive to the point of being an unbelievable character. I'm neither perfect nor all-forgiving, but I do think a lot of people are wonderful without them realising, or wonderful despite people's words.

I'm terribly obnoxious in that way, and by calling myself that of course I want others to contest it. And thereby be even more obnoxious.

Deal with it~

>>39137
>but I do think a lot of people are wonderful without them realising, or wonderful despite people's words.
That much I agree with. Of course there are people who think badly of themselves, but mean a lot to others. At least, you can easily imagine such a person.

Good night.

>>39135
Take care of yourself and good luck. I'm glad I could help a little.

>abraham lincoln, vampire hunter
>coming to theatres later this year
I don't know whether to be appalled or amused.

This conversation is too complicated for someone like me to understand.