Was a poison released?

>>622

>Was a poison released?
No.

>>623
Does this mystery require a knowledge of chemistry beyond things melting?

>>624

>Does this mystery require a knowledge of chemistry beyond things melting?
Maybe.

>>625
Did his skin melt?

>>626

>Did his skin melt?
No.

>>627
Did some part of him melt?

>>628

>Did some part of him melt?
Irrelevant. Maybe.

>>629
Did he suffocate?

>>630

>Did he suffocate?
No.

>>631
Was there any mechanical device involved?

>>633

>Was there any mechanical device involved?
No.

>>634
Did he drown?

>>635

>Did he drown?
No.

>>636
Was he dehydrated?

>>637

>Was he dehydrated?
No.

>>638
Was he burned? Were his pores clogged up?

>>639

>Was he burned?
Maybe.

>Were his pores clogged up?
No.

>>640
Was he exposed to extreme heat? To fire? To acid?

>>641

>Was he exposed to extreme heat? To fire? To acid?
No, no, no.

Was the thing that melted hotter than 100°C when it melted?
Did it melt solely because it was hotter than its melting point?
Did it come into direct contact with him before the moment of his death?

>>644

>Was the thing that melted hotter than 100°C when it melted?
No.

>Did it melt solely because it was hotter than its melting point?
No.

>Did it come into direct contact with him before the moment of his death?
Yes.

Was it inside him when it melted?
Would it melt due to mixing with something normally found in the human body?
Was he a human being?

>>646

>Was it inside him when it melted?
No.

>Would it melt due to mixing with something normally found in the human body?
No.

>Was he a human being?
Yes.

Was it a part of a larger man-made structure?
Is it something that melts in its everyday usage?
Did he know it might melt?
Did he know it was there at all?

>>650

>Was it a part of a larger man-made structure?
No.

>Is it something that melts in its everyday usage?
Yes.

>Did he know it might melt?
No.

>Did he know it was there at all?
No.

>>651
Was it some kind of sodium compound?

>>652

>Was it some kind of sodium compound?
No.

Is it something that is usually solid?
Is it something that is usually fatal to a person who touches it, whether melted or not?
Is it something that, when melted, is usually fatal to a person who touches?

>>654

>Is it something that is usually solid?
Yes.

>Is it something that is usually fatal to a person who touches it, whether melted or not?
No.

>Is it something that, when melted, is usually fatal to a person who touches?
No.

>>653
Did the person explode?

>>656

>Did the person explode?
No.

Was the direct contact between `him` and `it` part of the cause of his death?
Was there some property `it` possessed, that not everything of its kind possesses, which made it inherently more dangerous?

>>659

>Was the direct contact between `him` and `it` part of the cause of his death?
Maybe.

>Was there some property `it` possessed, that not everything of its kind possesses, which made it inherently more dangerous?
No.

If it had not made contact with him, would he still have died?

>>662

>If it had not made contact with him, would he still have died?
No.

was the thing that melted part of his food? or his drinks?
like a dangerous ice in his drink.......

>>665

>was the thing that melted part of his food?
No.

>or his drinks?
No.

>>666

>666
I see so no satanic cubes...~~~~

It is a person?

Did he choke on an ice cube?

>>667

>It is a person?
No.

>>668

>Did he choke on an ice cube?
No.

>>669
Did "it" induce a fire when it melted?

>>670

>Did "it" induce a fire when it melted?
No.

>>671
Did "He" pick "it" up with his hand before he died?

Did you kill him?

>>672

>Did "He" pick "it" up with his hand before he died?
Yes.

>Did you kill him?
No.

>>673
Did "he" put "it" into his mouth before he died?
Is "it" an element?
Is "it" a compound?
Is "it" a mixture?

Did it melt after he made contact with it?
Did his contact with it cause it to melt?

>>674

>Did "he" put "it" into his mouth before he died?
No.

>Is "it" an element?
No.

>Is "it" a compound?
Yes.

>Is "it" a mixture?
Yes.

>>675

>Did it melt after he made contact with it?
Yes.

>Did his contact with it cause it to melt?
No.

>>678
Is "it" H20?

>>679

>Is "it" H20?
Nope.

>>680
Is "it" a mixture/compound of two elements?

>>685

>Is "it" a mixture/compound of two elements?
No.

>>686
Is "it" easily found in any household?

>>688

>Is "it" easily found in any household?
Maybe.

>>689
"It" can be found in your kitchen.
"It" can be found in my kitchen.
"It" can be consumed in it's solid form.

>>690

>"It" can be found in your kitchen.
Yes.

>"It" can be found in my kitchen.
Maybe.

>"It" can be consumed in it's solid form.
Yes. But almost anything can be consumed in its solid form.

>>691
"It" is a drug which used to be in pill form.

>>692

>"It" is a drug which used to be in pill form.
No.

>>693
Did he cut himself?
Did he stab himself?
Does "it" melting have anything to do with his death?

>>694

>Did he cut himself?
No.

>Did he stab himself?
No.

>Does "it" melting have anything to do with his death?
Yes.

>>695
'It' was ingested.

>>696

>'It' was ingested.
No.

>>695
"It" melted and entered his bloodstream through osmosis.
He died of infection.
He died from an external wound.
The only part of his body that came into contact with "it" was his hand.

>>698

>"It" melted and entered his bloodstream through osmosis.
No.

>He died of infection.
No.

>He died from an external wound.
Yes.

>The only part of his body that came into contact with "it" was his hand.
No.

>>699
'It' was also used in combination with a weapon.

>>700

>'It' was also used in combination with a weapon.
Yes.

"It" did not melt after coming into contact with him, someone heated "it" till it melted.

Small pieces of "It" remained on his wounds.

These small pieces of "It" melted.

>>702

>"It" did not melt after coming into contact with him, someone heated "it" till it melted.
Yes.

>Small pieces of "It" remained on his wounds.
No.

>These small pieces of "It" melted.
No.

>>704
"He" died when "it" melted, however the culprit X aka someone did not die.

There were no traces of "it" inside or outside on his body after he came into contact with it.

"It" was brown in color as a solid.

'It' was injected by some means.

>>705

>"He" died when "it" melted, however the culprit X aka someone did not die.
Yes.

>There were no traces of "it" inside or outside on his body after he came into contact with it.
Yes.

>"It" was brown in color as a solid.
Irrelevant. It can be any color.

>>706

>'It' was injected by some means.
No.

"He" was murdered by someone who heated "it" aka X.

"He" was allergic to "it".

>>709

>"He" was murdered by someone who heated "it" aka X.
No.

>"He" was allergic to "it".
No.

Any further questions will be answered at my earliest convenience.

"It" was melted in the same room as "him".

After melting "it", "he" came into contact with "it" again.

The moment "it" melted, "he" died.

Is "it" edible on it's own?

Is "it" used frequently in cooking?

The wound(s) on "his" body were made by a knife.

"It" came into contact with "his" entire body before he died.

"It" came into contact with "his" entire body before he received the wound(s).

"It" is soap.

The wound(s) "he" received were bruises.

A second substance was involved in "his" death.

"It" has volatile properties.

"It" has a pungent smell.

"It" is colorless in it's solid and liquid form.

Is "it" used for cleaning purposes?

>>712

>"It" was melted in the same room as "him".
Yes.

>After melting "it", "he" came into contact with "it" again.
No.

>The moment "it" melted, "he" died.
Yes.

>Is "it" edible on it's own?
Yes.

>Is "it" used frequently in cooking?
Yes.

>The wound(s) on "his" body were made by a knife.
No.

>"It" came into contact with "his" entire body before he died.
No.

>"It" came into contact with "his" entire body before he received the wound(s).
No.

>"It" is soap.
No.

>The wound(s) "he" received were bruises.
No.

>A second substance was involved in "his" death.
Yes.

>"It" has volatile properties.
No.

>"It" has a pungent smell.
Yes

>"It" is colorless in it's solid and liquid form.
No.

>Is "it" used for cleaning purposes?
Yes.

>>713
"It" is alcohol.

"It" is a condiment.

"It" is a common household substance.

"It" is usually kept in the refrigerator.

Do I have to guess the second substance?

Only "his" wounds(s) came into contact with "it".

Other parts of "his" body came into contact with "it" when "it" was still solid.

"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body before he died.

"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body before he received the wound(s).

"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body after he died.

"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body after he received the wound(s).

The weapon was a baguette.

>>714

>"It" is alcohol.
No.

>"It" is a condiment.
No.

>"It" is a common household substance.
Maybe.

>"It" is usually kept in the refrigerator.
No.

>Do I have to guess the second substance?
No.

>Only "his" wounds(s) came into contact with "it".
No.

>Other parts of "his" body came into contact with "it" when "it" was still solid.
Yes.

>"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body before he died.
Yes.

>"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body before he received the wound(s).
Yes.

>"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body after he died.
No.

>"It" came into contact with parts of "his" body after he received the wound(s).
No.

>The weapon was a baguette.
No.

>>715
The temperature of "it" is below room temperature as a solid.

The temperature of "it" is above room temperature as a solid.

The temperature of "it" is above zero degrees Celsius as a liquid.

The temperature of "it" is below zero degrees Celsius as a liquid.

The wounds(s) were not fatal.

"He" died from hypothermia.

"He" did not have any burn wounds.

Hydrogen peroxide was not involved in "his" death.

I am still confus.

>>716
Perhaps I should remind you that "it" did not simply melt from being heated past its melting point. Presumably there was some other chemical reaction that occurred.

Don't have time to read back through the answers just now, so expect my questions to be delayed too.

"It" can be usually consumed without any harmful health repercusion.
"It" was not influenced by other substances a second before melting.
He died because of the temperature difference with the melting substance.

>>716

>The temperature of "it" is below room temperature as a solid.
Irrelevant. Yes.

>The temperature of "it" is above room temperature as a solid.
Irrelevant. Yes.

>The temperature of "it" is above zero degrees Celsius as a liquid.
Yes.

>The temperature of "it" is below zero degrees Celsius as a liquid.
No.

>The wounds(s) were not fatal.
No.

>"He" died from hypothermia.
No.

>"He" did not have any burn wounds.
No.

>Hydrogen peroxide was not involved in "his" death.
Yes.

>>719

>"It" can be usually consumed without any harmful health repercusion.
Yes.

>"It" was not influenced by other substances a second before melting.
No.

>He died because of the temperature difference with the melting substance.
No.

Was it an ice cube?

>>725
No!

>>726

Good, was it butter?

>>727
No.

>>728

Was it chocolate?

>>729
Nope.

>>730

Was it George?!

Was it marshmallow?

>>731
No and no.

>>732

Was it food?

>>733
No!

It was probably just some fuck this, I'm going to see some mythbusters until I get an idea

>>734

Was it a dissolvable pill?

>>735
Have fun.

>>736
Nope. Too easy.

>>737

Never hurts to try, since I've been the first person to mention it and all.

>>738

Oh, and was it Alka-Seltzer?

>>738
Ryuga mentioned a pill, actually.