>>
|
No. 10910
Some information:
1) There can be, at most, three culprits, but only two are relevant here because only two could be among the group that is making statements. LOGIC: There are only two bodies maximum (Eva, Natsuhi), but the FT killer could be the culprit for these killings. Two more people could be culprits since there are up to two more bodies, and a culprit must kill with their own hands. Thus each of two people could become a culprit by killing one of Eva or Natsuhi each.
2) If Eva and Natsuhi are in fact dead (remember, they may not be; Nanjo and Krauss could be liars), then they are not culprits, and all their statements are true. This would mean that Kumasawa cannot be a culprit, because she suggested splitting up (even if she was lying about it being death, she did suggest it). It also means Rudolf cannot be a culprit, because Kumasawa says he's not. If only Eva is dead, Rudolf and Kumasawa are still eliminated. If only Natsuhi is dead, it is possible for Eva to be a culprit and thus lying and so we can't assure ourselves of that anymore. LOGIC: A culprit cannot die, so if you die you're not a culprit. If you're not a culprit, what you say is truth. If what Eva says is true, Kumasawa is not a culprit. If what Kumasawa says is true, Rudolf is not a culprit.
3) Kyrie's statement "neither of you would kill your wives," even if true, only means that Krauss cannot kill Natsuhi and Hideyoshi cannot kill Eva. LOGIC: It is possible for the statement to still be true and Krauss/Hideyoshi to be culprits if Hideyoshi killed Natsuhi and/or Krauss killed Eva.
4) If Gohda is telling the truth, it is very likely that Genji is as well. If Genji is telling the truth, Shannon is dead and Kanon doesn't exist, so the culprit is probably among the group that has spoken. Additionally, if no servant is a culprit, then it's probably true that the culprit used the doors from the courtyard, which suggests Rosa may be telling the truth. LOGIC: Even if "Beatrice" remains alive, she is an unknown person.
5) Remember that while culprits may lie, culprits do not have to lie; I am fairly certain that whoever the culprit or culprits are, some of the things they are stating are true. For example even if Kyrie were a liar, it doesn't mean she couldn't have stated some things which are true. LOGIC: Common sense; "may" does not mean "must," and "possible" does not mean "required."
6) If Nanjo is lying, even if Eva and Natsuhi are dead, they may not have died of gunshot wounds. If Rudolf is not a culprit, this all but assures Nanjo is lying, as we're told the only guns being carried are held by Rudolf, Eva, and Natsuhi (although I suppose it's possible to take the fourth gun if it's not really defective and kill with it, but that makes Genji and Rosa culprits, which starts pushing past the possible limit). One of Eva or Natsuhi may also be a culprit, but it would require Nanjo and Krauss to also be culprits, so I suspect that wouldn't be the case because of the limit (and indeed, if one of Eva or Natsuhi is alive, the number of possible culprits decreases). LOGIC: If Rudolf isn't a culprit, he didn't kill with his gun, which means the only guns that could kill Eva or Natsuhi belong to the other person. If one killed the other, they are a culprit. If both killed each other, the rules are broken, because a culprit cannot die.
7) The culprit almost certainly is wet. This is what Kyrie and Hideyoshi were driving at (it doesn't matter if they're telling the truth, it's just the idea). This suggests the culprit went outside, which means they went through the courtyard, which means they probably weren't a servant if and only if the statements by Rudolf, Kyrie, and Nanjo are true. LOGIC: The only thing that really makes sense for Hideyoshi to mention their clothes for is whether they're wet. The only reason they'd be wet is if they were outside.
|